Thursday, January 17, 2013
Putting bad air down under (in the Up-Goer Five Way)
(I made this in the Up-Goer Five way, using Up-Goer Six. Also, Up-Goer Five does let me say "Mr. William" and "Goer", so there.)
Mr. William says putting bad air way down under takes too much money, and then says why keep trying it? One answer would be that it's not working out right now but may in the future, and given we use so many things that make bad air, it's too important to stop.
An even better reason to me is do it because it could make good party-office sense even if it doesn't make the best money sense. It will be a lot less hard in party-office work to put the bad air business through change that will hurt it than to kill it (not to mention the fire air business down the road that we will need to do something with too). It's the same reason for saying yes to getting power when we break apart really really small things - the only little-bad-air choice that the party-office right does like - I'll say yes to some of it as part of a big deal to act on bad-air change.
As I've done before, I see this as a lot like the office-party stuff at my water office-work. We have the most-big city in the US that hasn't put stuff in its water to help keep the hard part of our mouth we use to eat from getting hurt because of the sweet things we eat or drink. A poor part of the city has many problems in children with this. While a personal story is not very good way to help reason out this party-office fight, I can say I've felt really bad mouth pain and would never want a small child to feel the same. So we're going to put that stuff to the water.
But, many people are very angry about this and come when we meet to try to either change our mind or tell us what bad people we are. One reason they give is that of the three things we can use in the water to help the hard part of our mouth, the one used most is just no-good stuff that comes out from the end of making other no-good stuff, and they say we're being made to drink bad water just as an easy way to throw away the no-good stuff.
I don't really buy that reason, but right now I might say that if we have to pay only a little more for the other two things than that one thing they don't like, then we should use those instead. As a matter of party-office things, it gets us to a good choice when the "perfect" money-sense choice might cause a lot more of a party-office fight.
For a decision on how to fix bad air over a long time, same thing - we can't keep the party-office side out of it.